3 angles from my side:
1. The technician (sysadmin for many years) - There is certainly room for improvements but some "simple things" aren't simple to implement.
2. The open source enthusiast: The requests come from all sides and some might be iffy. What's good for, let's say, Meta, isn't good for me.
3. The user: I compare it to a pub. It's fleeting by nature. Best bits end up in a "notebook" elsewhere.
I have 50+ followers, I can tell them where to find me when I move.
@petros @kissane Re the first item, it annoys me that Masto devs favour simplicity over the unsurprising.
Ideally, you architect your system to have unsurprising behaviour.
Failing that, you add some kind of adaptor layer to look unsurprising to users.
Failing that, your docs (and UI!) should make it clear how the thing will surprise you.
I know *so* much software doesn't do this, but every surprise sends such a message to Masto users...
(You got me on a pet whinge, not targeted at you.)