@nixCraft This story has nothing to do with RHEL. The IBM dev apologised for his behaviour. But I guess the clickbait urge wins again? ;)
Top-level
@nixCraft This story has nothing to do with RHEL. The IBM dev apologised for his behaviour. But I guess the clickbait urge wins again? ;) 11 comments
@jwildeboer @nixCraft confusing ownership is not unexpected from people who think that RHEL is a company (or anyhow else an actor). @jwildeboer @nixCraft I'm sad that the newly fashionable Red Hat hatred has completely obscured the actually interesting and important issue: this "customers are prohibited from using software with known high/critical vulnerabilities" bit (by no means specific to IBM, I've heard it in other contexts). Sounds like weaponizing CVEs, potentially against any open source. @jwildeboer This is not a refutation. What you’re doing here is a pretty novel approach to your stated job though. Good luck with that, or something. @donaldball So far you only did rhetoric games and offered no argument to counter my point that this story is not related to Red Hat or RHEL. So I wish you a nice Sunday and I will step out to enjoy summer life in Munich :) |
@jwildeboer @nixCraft What do you mean, nothing to do with RHEL? Isn't Red Hat an IBM brand?