Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Brian Harrod

#LOL... Who said all political ads are boring? This is probably the hottest political ad you’ll ever see.....

2023 ELECTIONS: Ohio Vote No On August 8th 🔥

53 comments
Nonya Bidniss 🥥🌴

@BrianHarrod OMG #Dems need a LOT MORE OF THIS. Nationwide! 💯 🔥

Kevin Leecaster

@Nonya_Bidniss @BrianHarrod
Independents that care about freedom should run advertisements like this too since there are more Americans in the "Independent" party than there are in either the Democratic or Republican parties nowadays.

kinyutaka

@GreenFire @Nonya_Bidniss @BrianHarrod

Bring in Roger from Cracked.

The most trustworthy old white guy on the internet

youtu.be/Bqavq5pUC04

Jester 🪓

@BrianHarrod THIS is the political ad we’ve been waiting for our whole lives! #Election2024 #Ohio #USpol #DNC

DELETED

@BrianHarrod

This really is something! Let us hope it does the trick.

DELETED

mastodon.social/@foufoutos@kaf
Οταν ειδα τη μισή οθόνη της φάσης του video σκεφτηκα: Ωχ τι θα μα δειξει ο @baskin

Nicole Parsons

@BrianHarrod

More of these types of ads need to be done.

Republican billionaires and GOP politicians on the subject of:

1. Putin's genocidal war on Ukraine
2. Women voting
3. Unions
4. POC civil rights & affirmative action
5. Immigrants & refugees
6. Non Christians
7. LGBTQ medical care
9. Reproductive rights
10. Military preparedness
11. Privacy
12. Climate change & ESG
13. Democracy
14. Trump's Jan 6 coup

Ed Wiebe

@BrianHarrod We sorted this out in the 1960s here in Canada. The USA is bonkers. cbc.ca/amp/1.4681298 It is a good ad.

RowinSpeez

@edwiebe @BrianHarrod Every couple years these fake righteous people pop up and test the waters, and Doug Ford won’t shut up about god these days. Never let your guard down when it comes to rights we thought were untouchable.

Sphinx of Black Quartz

@BklynMichael42 @BrianHarrod

"Hi, I'm your four-times-divorced uncle who is no longer welcome at family gatherings because of what I said to your cousin Emily and her wife a few years ago... and now I get to control YOUR love life, too!"

Nicole Parsons

@BrianHarrod

A whole-of-society response to the GOP & their anti-democracy billionaire donors is overdue.

Iowa & Ohio enact anti-women legislation, the GOP won't stop until they lose elections again & again & again.

The Ohio GOP is corrupt & wants to lock voters out of democracy.

They're buying a voting bloc: woman-hating religions & religions who hid child abuse.

The GOP took away women's civil rights to "save children" & yet takes money from churches who hurt actual children for decades.

Nicole Parsons
troy_frizzell

@Npars01

Gee, you'd think people would be talking about GOP corruption.

Particularly Democrats.

The Janx Devil

@Npars01 Guillotines for the billionaires. Lions for the Bible-thumping fascists.

Sher'

@BrianHarrod Best as I've EVER seen! 🧡💛💚💙❤😀

Ivan Sagalaev :flag_wbw:

@BrianHarrod would be better if the man wouldn't just silently wait while his woman challenges the creep, but got up and turned the fuck's face into meat jelly, like the all deserve… But we're too politically correct for that. Yet.

Black Chic with the Red Truck

@isagalaev
While that would be entertaining, it would ultimately only add fuel to the GOP narrative that they are the “real” victims.

Allanon

@BrianHarrod Daaaaaaaamn! That makes it quite clear.

marius

@BrianHarrod the politicians supporting these kind of ideas need to check how it went for other people that tried it. As an example, Communist Romania during late sixties: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decree_7

They need to check about the lost generation that resulted from that, with more than half million babies ending up in foster care - terrible foster care at that: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanian

marius

@BrianHarrod also they made a documentary about it (which is pretty heart wrenching, so watch with care): youtube.com/watch?v=rNP-ybp0AY

DELETED

@BrianHarrod So good! Love it when Democrats get cheeky.

Ian Hecht

@BrianHarrod That's awesome! In Canada, one of our politicians said, in 1967:

“There is no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation”

It would be great if Republicans could catch up.

C0ppertop

@BrianHarrod they should have taken out a gun and shot him in the head in the last frame. I defend, my rights.

Robin

@BrianHarrod hahaha haha ha 😭 I don’t like Ohio

Piousunyn

@BrianHarrod

Republicans have a fetish about other peoples lives and how they should live them.

Candace Robb

@BrianHarrod This evokes all the creepiness I feel looking at Republicans, esp the good ole boys. This is brilliant.

DELETED

@BrianHarrod Wasn't there that one governor or senator or some similar candidate who had full on penetrative sex on porn hub as a campaign ad?

EDIT: Yup, a congressman: papermag.com/mike-itkis-sextap

nagvanshi9275

@BrianHarrod one of best attention seeking ads that I have ever seen in my life

Stu Duerson

@BrianHarrod

I'm running for Congress. As a Republican! The perks, the perks.

On second thought...

KatMan Kilby

@BrianHarrod
Excellent.
"Politician Guy" captures the essence of the sex-obsessed, pseudo-christian, fascist Repugnantcans beautifully.

ZhiZhu

@BrianHarrod

Sexy political ad about GOP banning birth control:
youtu.be/z10j_H7zOb8

Will #GOP ban birth control?

Read Clarence Thomas’ concurring opinion when #SCOTUS overturned #RoeVWade. He states, “we should reconsider … precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence and Obergefell”

Griswold established personal freedoms including the right to use #BirthControl.
Lawrence established the freedom to have sex however you like.
Obergefell established the freedom to marry whoever you love.

Screen shot of Clarence Thomas' concurrence when SCOTUS overturned Roe V Wade:

Cite as: 597 U. S. ____ (2022) 

THOMAS, J., concurring

381 U. S. 479 (1965) (right of married persons to obtain contraceptives)*; Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U. S. 558 (2003) (right to engage in private, consensual sexual acts); and Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U. S. 644 (2015) (right to same-sex marriage), are not at issue. The Court’s abortion cases are unique, see ante, at 31–32, 66, 71–72, and no party has asked us to decide “whether our entire Fourteenth Amendment jurisprudence must be preserved or revised,” McDonald, 561 U. S., at 813 (opinion of THOMAS, J.). Thus, I agree
that “[n]othing in [the Court’s] opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion.” Ante, at 66.

For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell. 

source: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf
page 119
Go Up