@tomodachi94 it still needs to be paid for though, which it does through their crypto, filecoin
Top-level
@tomodachi94 it still needs to be paid for though, which it does through their crypto, filecoin 6 comments
@shipp @tomodachi94 Isn't filecoin a separate project built on IPFS? I haven't used IPFS specifically, but my experience with P2P file sharing protocols is that they work just fine without money trading hands. (In fact, most of my experience with them is from before Bitcoin existed, so it's jarring to see them lumped in with cryptocurrencies.) Someone is anyway already paying to host nix packages over (I assume) https; surely they could also pay to pin the files on IPFS. @shipp @tomodachi94 (And by paying to pin, I mean paying the hosting costs of a server pinning the files.) @falsifian @shipp Yup! There's actually some services (like Pinata) that used to let you do that; I'm not sure if they still do. @falsifian @shipp From my understanding, it is, but many of the IPFS contributors also have done work on Filecoin. (I agree, I find it jarring that you can't really post about IPFS without someone immediately bringing up the crypto users.) @shipp @tomodachi94 ipfs is a peer to peer file block transfer protocol. The main implementation kubo (ex go-ipfs) is open source and free of charge, everyone can run it. |
@shipp Filecoin is entirely optional to the operation of an IPFS node.
I'll amend my original claim: IPFS isn't *just* crypto, but there are crypto-related applications, just like HTTP has crypto and non-crypto applications.