Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
22 comments
Doran Wetzel

@ZachWeinersmith It’s little AI brian is gonna EXPLODE once it discovers that women can vote, and then it will be calmed by the continued existence of the pay gap.

DELETED

@ZachWeinersmith

Good news everybody! Most social media posts are not eligible for copyright protection.

Wildduck

@ZachWeinersmith I was thinking... What type of protection do provide all the fanfictions websites?
That's a recipe for the most horny AI ever, waiting to happen.

Oggie

@Wildduck @ZachWeinersmith
I'm not sure how much free time you want to spend on this, but let's just say the full controls stopping chatGPT from going horny on main are....not exactly ironclad.

Honestly you can get around pretty much every restriction, especially since it builds on itself within the conversation, so you can take it on a walk to get these things to reply in a certain way. And I got one version to just start spouting porn, basically.

I was bored, okay?

@Wildduck @ZachWeinersmith
I'm not sure how much free time you want to spend on this, but let's just say the full controls stopping chatGPT from going horny on main are....not exactly ironclad.

Honestly you can get around pretty much every restriction, especially since it builds on itself within the conversation, so you can take it on a walk to get these things to reply in a certain way. And I got one version to just start spouting porn, basically.

IBBoard

@Wildduck @ZachWeinersmith Fanfic is still under copyright of the author, because it's their creative content in a recorded form and it's a "transformative work". They just down own the characters and so are limited in how they can publish that work.

That's why there's the OTW (transformativeworks.org/) to protect fan works. Just because they don't own the characters, it doesn't mean that other people (or even the characters' owners) can ignore copyright.

mndflayr :damnified: :debian:

@Wildduck @ZachWeinersmith
Wait, not all Fan Fiction is erotic, right?

Let me check it....

Ohh....

Nick

@Wolven I think @ZachWeinersmith is horning in on your territory. :blobwink:

Waterluvian

@ZachWeinersmith I am so sick and tired of my BossBot quoting Beowulf and Shakespeare.

“A null pointer by any other name” does not help me…

…but it’s no worse than my last boss.

Stampeding Longhorn :budgie:

@ZachWeinersmith Good, maybe we'll have mouse ears go out of copyright sooner.

George Station

@ZachWeinersmith We can't blame Disney hanging onto Mickey Mouse for every problem... or can we?

Marc Robinson-Rechavi

@ZachWeinersmith on the other hand I look forward to seeing science generated in the style of Darwin or Jean-Henri Fabre.

Tony Wells

@ZachWeinersmith

The movie Metropolis is now in the public domain.
The writers and actors striking over AI use should be on the lookout for any of their kin who look or sound a bit robotic, as the film, television and streaming studio heads will undoubtedly have fed Metropolis into their AI and asked how it can break the strike.

Steffen Christensen

@ZachWeinersmith Thank you for this, Zach. I'm bringing it to my AI team here at Horizons.

Adrian Segar

@ZachWeinersmith @cstross
I only wish that OpenAI and their ilk would stop scraping copyrighted content.

However, as I shared on the @nytimes, OpenAI has definitely incorporated the entire text of at least one of my (copyright registered in 2010) books on meeting design into the ChatGPT database.

See the replies to my comment to see folks questions about copyright and my responses.

Gift link (click on comments and then Readers Picks to view): nytimes.com/2023/07/13/technol

@ZachWeinersmith @cstross
I only wish that OpenAI and their ilk would stop scraping copyrighted content.

However, as I shared on the @nytimes, OpenAI has definitely incorporated the entire text of at least one of my (copyright registered in 2010) books on meeting design into the ChatGPT database.

See the replies to my comment to see folks questions about copyright and my responses.

NY Times headline: F.T.C. Opens Investigation Into ChatGPT Maker Over Technology’s Potential Harms

Subhead: The agency sent OpenAI, which makes ChatGPT, a letter this week over consumer harms and the company’s security practices.

AJS (Adrian Segar) Comment: The content of at least one of my books on meeting design, copyright registered in 2010 with the United States Copyright Office, has been added to ChatGPT's database without my permission. It was probably scraped from one of the illegal pirate internet libraries of scanned books.

Though I'm weakly flattered that ChatGPT has also incorporated every single post I've written on my meeting design blog (over 750 posts in the last 13 years—around half a million words), OpenAI's flagrant misappropriation of copyrighted works from pirate databases for their own financial gain is beyond the pale.

16 Replies 185 Recommend
tmk
@ZachWeinersmith I was wondering why my medicine recommendation engine was only perscribing cocaine, laudanum, and soda for every ailment.
Harry le Roy

@ZachWeinersmith let’s call these copyright lawsuits what they are: clear cash-grabs trying to stoke fear among the ignorant about how the training datasets are gathered and used. They’re no different from patent trolls and their rent-seeking drain on progress.

Go Up