@mhoye @XaiaX > spicy autocomplete
huh, nah the topic here is text classification, which is similar to text prediction (and there is probably a way to use Huffman tables to produce suggestions, etc.), but not the same.
> So, maybe a wikipedia dump and a gutenberg mirror is plenty?
probably yes. (imo coolest would be producing a tool that could both classify and predict using the same infrastructure (light preprocessed large text dumps (<10GiB), massive improvement)
@fogti @XaiaX I'm a bit more interested in predictive text tools that give you stylistic nudges towards artists you admire, and finding a way to get artists paid for that. Smart autocomplete/smart fill tools that answer, "what might Degas have done right here?"