Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Jan โ˜•๐ŸŽผ๐ŸŽนโ˜๏ธ๐Ÿ‹๏ธโ€โ™‚๏ธ

@gamingonlinux
There is a massive difference to building on others (ergo adding value/ideas) and just rebuilding verbatim. I believe that is what they are trying to convey.

3 comments
Liam @ GamingOnLinux ๐Ÿง๐ŸŽฎ

@jan Yes there is and I somewhat agree on simply rebadging. However, that is also largely part of the open source community and what licensing allows so again ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

Often these downstreams are to simply get around paying licensing for support costs to get it free. So in a way, yeah these downstreams do become total freeloaders. And entirely depending on someone elseโ€™s work is such a bad business model to begin with.

Jan โ˜•๐ŸŽผ๐ŸŽนโ˜๏ธ๐Ÿ‹๏ธโ€โ™‚๏ธ

@gamingonlinux
What really does rub me the wrong way is all the corporate entities that I know which depend on caentos (back in the day), make a crapton of profit, yet refuse to buy a support license, give anything back to FOSS,... they just take, contributing nothing back.

Those should be weeded out.

Alex

@gamingonlinux @jan

well, this can either be a response to Oracle Linux literally just taking RHEL downstream and repackaging it and reselling, or a response to NASA actually signing a contract with RockyLinux.

either way, they should come up with a way to limit corporate freeloading instead. they are annoyed that Oracle is using it without paying? restrict Oracle, not everyone else.

Go Up