Gregory's Server@ljrk @sindarina @miki 2.2.2.2 and 8.8.8.8 both looks like an dummy IP (users could think it's not a real IP) but they are real, functional IPs you should not use as examples (unless DNS stuff with Google).
RFCs being unknown to some users is a very good reason to use them, the more there are documents using theses "documentation" IPs, the more people will recognize them easily.
@C_Duv @sindarina @miki I know.
That's not how learning works.
Please don't repeat boring and well-known points instead of engaging with the other side's counter points. It really leads to nothing. If I say "but A is a good reason to do X" and you say "yeah, but there are other reasons B and C for Y" then none of our statements actually are in conflict you see?
Both are true. There are reasons for using that RFC (I said so myself, g'damnit) and reasons against. Telling me more reasons for using that RFC doesn't change the fact that there are reasons against it.
I'm outta here, this is such a bullshit "discussion".
@C_Duv @sindarina @miki I know.
That's not how learning works.
Please don't repeat boring and well-known points instead of engaging with the other side's counter points. It really leads to nothing. If I say "but A is a good reason to do X" and you say "yeah, but there are other reasons B and C for Y" then none of our statements actually are in conflict you see?