@mannix@chaos.social @jaredwhite@indieweb.social
Let me see if I understand your stance - should anyone be invited into your house, you will be entitled to rifle their pockets and belongings for anything you can sell to a third party, up to an including taking biometric measurements and recording everything they say. A fact you will only make apparent on an intentionally lengthy and tortuously worded document written in tiny, dense font that you waved at them on entry after promising them the time of their life. If so, then would you like to come round to my place for the time of your life.

Don't get me wrong - reading EULs is as important as not getting into the position of having Suge Knight dangle you out of a window when you need to renew a contract . "Caveat Emptor" hasn't been an acceptable legal defence for retail fraud in most modern legal systems for at least a couple of hundred years - so why should it be brought up in relation in digital environments. Refer to articles stating "surprise Mechanics" are not gambling, for the answer.