Gregory's ServerWe shouldn't be worrying about AI wiping out humanity. That's a smokescreen. That's sci-fi. We need to worry about the *individuals* now and in the near future who can be hurt by the premature deployment of generative AI systems that spew wrong answers and lies, and then when asked for confirmation, lie about their own lies! And just popping up warnings to users is useless, because you know and I know that hardly anyone will read those warnings or pay any attention to them whatsoever.
|
6 comments
 While I'm at it, add a requirement that the output include a link to every piece of content the model was trained on for which the company doesn't have a contract/license/release from its creator. Solves the uncredited, used-without-permission problem. @cazabon It's not clear that even including the links will do any good. Hardly anyone will bother clicking them. The result is the GAI is a taker of data and gives little or nothing in return, not even the clicks and views that traditional SERPs generate. My idea is that being forced to include 2 billion links for content they don't have a signed release for using, it would encourage training only using material they did, in fact, obtain permission to use as input. 😂  @lauren we should worry even more about *individuals* now and in the near future who knowingly and cynically make and market these engines of deceit in order to profit from the chaos and confusion they will cause. |
@lauren
The warnings are also cold comfort to the loved ones of the guy the vigilante gang beat to death because some generated content somewhere labelled him an unrepentant pedophile in their neighbourhood.
I don't know what the solution is. Mandate that an indicator of its origin be prominently displayed within the generated text? How could that work?
#LLM #generative