Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
LisPi

@quirk Picketing isn't what's effective about collectively refusing to perform labor. The core is a lot simpler.

Publishing broadly on all channels that no work is happening at the company (or across all employers for that field) would accomplish about the same.

Unless we go back, I suppose, to historical precedents where there was a tangible threat of direct violence and sabotage... but then sabotage is still feasible. I'm not sure that's what you're advocating though.

5 comments
Paul Quirk

@lispi314 you could organize a union or guild, and go on strike if your demands aren't met, but what's to stop the company from employing scabs to do the work? If the work needs to be done at an office, your picket line becomes a physical barrier. If everyone is working from home, they could employ scabs and nobody would be the wiser until it's too late.

LisPi

@quirk They could just hire remote scabs for all work that can be done remote and use helicopters for those that absolutely need to be on-site (likewise food delivery via private drones is doable).

There's very little we can actually do about that if they're willing to bother.

The social mechanism of sharing what they're doing and refusing to work for employers that do that would be more practical and effective. Widespread membership in the union would make it a lot easier to check for that.

Paul Quirk replied to LisPi

@lispi314 except there may be laws in your country that require work be done in the office. Laws that may have been put in place to protect you and your rights. Laws that would be much easier to circumvent should everyone decide they ought to be working from home. And if you think it's so easy to get everyone in your profession to join your union, I recommend a book called Dreams of Dignity, workers of vision. If you want to know your future, study the past.

LisPi replied to Paul

@quirk In the meantime, employers here have done exactly nothing but the most ineffective and minimal of implementation of biosafety measures despite a pandemic with >=10% chances of permanently disabling you (partly or fully) on every infection.

I don't consider being forced to expose myself to gratuitous biohazards to be adequate protection (it's also against our bill of rights).

I'll still take note of that book as it might be interesting.

Paul Quirk replied to LisPi

@lispi314 this quote by Oscar Wilde comes to mind: "There are only two tragedies in life: one is not getting what one wants, and the other is getting it."

Go Up