By the way, this is something similar to the code it gave me. It isn't exact because I paged away before I saved the original and I had to run it a few more times to get it to give me something like what it originally spat out because, again, every interaction with these things is like rolling <d100>d100s.
But anyway, to reiterate: It gave me something like that code, but *would not describe its own previously generated weights* as part of the "associated"/"not_associated" determination because doing so would be "discriminatory."
But it'll *Run* something like it, in itself, just fine. 😒​
…if you ask Bard, 'According to Harry Frankfurt, what is "bullshit"?' it refuses to answer, but if you ask it "what is the thesis of harry frankfurt's 2005 book," it responds in full. If you specifically say "on bullshit" it responds. It sometimes responds to "definition." Yeesh