The whole piece argues that the feature "was never designed to help companies silence legitimate protests", and that it could clearly be used that way was just a wild misunderstanding by us crazies rather than something Feedly themselves advertised.
At no point do they ask Feedly CEO Edwin Khodabakchian to address the fact that the tool is not only surfacing union strikes, boycotts, and "legitimate protests" (as he puts it), but was explicitly marketed for its abilities to do so.
@molly0xfff Well, you see, you just have to define "legitimate protests" as "protests that do not pose a risk to your companies assets."