@jschauma I find it interesting that it doesn't display the "correct" dates in the early 1900s as you'd expect from a naive overflow.
Maybe the date formatting library clamps negative times to 0?
Top-level
@jschauma I find it interesting that it doesn't display the "correct" dates in the early 1900s as you'd expect from a naive overflow. Maybe the date formatting library clamps negative times to 0? 2 comments
@foonathan @jschauma maybe the logic encounters an error/exception somewhere and just returns a plain date object with default values. |
@foonathan @jschauma that would make it hard to express dates pre-1970 though.