Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
dragosr

30 years ago today, we started putting images on the web. Marc Andreessen proposed adding the IMG tag to HTML.

35 comments
aburka 🫣 #SaveChandra

@dragosr So the dynamic of "standard" as "I have implemented this in my browser and now the rest of you must too or you'll be behind" started right at the beginning

Renée

@aburka in the early days of consensus internet a working implementation went a lot further than a proposal that would get bikeshedded to death on Usenet, tho.

Proud as I am to have been blocked by MA on Twitter ages ago for politely calling bullshit on some fuckery or other, this isn't the worst way to go about presenting an idea for negotiating a change to a standard. "Let's try it, and if it works, share with others" isn't a bad approach.

@dragosr

Jeff Smith

@reneestephen @aburka @dragosr Rough consensus and running code. “Rough consensus” loosely defined

🌸🌹2ck 🌱🐇

@reneestephen
isn't it still the way things are done? yeah, you need to make a spec and propose it, but if you come with working code that just cuts down on so much variation from underspecified parts of the system to have a reference implementation
@aburka @dragosr

Sören

@reneestephen @aburka @dragosr that may have been true then, but today, the dynamic is

1) (browser vendor) implements feature
2) browser vendor also offers spec
3) it gets accepted as a draft
4) web devs start using it
5) other browser vendors have comments on the spec; it’s still a draft
6) web devs ignore them, complain that other browsers don’t implement the feature the exact way vendor 1 did

It’s… not great. Maybe the days of prefixing were better after all.

@reneestephen @aburka @dragosr that may have been true then, but today, the dynamic is

1) (browser vendor) implements feature
2) browser vendor also offers spec
3) it gets accepted as a draft
4) web devs start using it
5) other browser vendors have comments on the spec; it’s still a draft
6) web devs ignore them, complain that other browsers don’t implement the feature the exact way vendor 1 did

Andrew Diederich

@dragosr I remember about three years later when grad students started asking for SLIP/PPP accounts so they could get images dialed in. I thought "Well, I guess if you think you need it..."

Shatter

@andrewdied @dragosr

my school had ppp on shell dialup which was more fun than you could imagine in 1994.

Brad

@dragosr thanks, I uh, didn't actually need to know I'm older than pictures on the internet :/
I'm soooooooo old

Dale Hagglund

@dragosr Between that and the BLINK tag, it's been downhill ever since. (Dammit, where in hell is the old-man-in-a-rocking-chair emoji when I want it.)

Денис 🇺🇦

@dragosr the missed opportunity to make the alt= property required...

John Wilson

@dragosr
Happy that the usage of ‘foobar’ lives on

Larry Garfield

@dragosr Related: The first image on the web was from CERN's all-girl science rock band: themarginalian.org/2014/07/18/

Their one album is actually pretty great.

Phil Stevens

@dragosr Back in the days when Marc was making decent suggestions.

Before <blink>, that is.

Bread80

@dragosr I’m old enough to remember when you could add height and width tags so the page didn’t keep jumping around while elements downloaded.

Curtiss Grymala (he/him/his)

@dragosr @chris To think; "XBM" and "XPM" formats were the ones that they thought made the most sense to support initially. I've been involved with computers and the web for 30+ years, and I don't recall ever using those formats for anything. TIFF? sure. BMP? absolutely. GIF? Obviously. I even remember how revolutionary it was when I discovered JPG on a BBS. XBM/XPM? Not at all.

calcifer :nes_fire:

@cgrymala @dragosr @chris it’s a while ago, so I may misremember, but I think this was because xpm and xbm were among the very few image formats without patent encumberments. A lot of software used those formats internally, so it’s not surprising that you didn’t interact with them as files, though.

Most of the image formats you know now are more popular now because of combinations of patents expiring and more permissive licenses (read and display not having a royalty, for example)

Renoir Boulanger

I was looking for that one!!!

In which mailing list? I'm unsure it's in one of @w3c archives. The few attempts I've made, I didn't find.

(Oh, it doesn't have an alt attribute, I'll have to re-post, sorry)

Thanks @dragosr

Renoir Boulanger

30 years ago today, we started putting images on the #Web. Marc Andreessen proposed adding the IMG tag to #HTML.

/Reposting from @dragosr but making the screenshot with an alt text

ticho

@dragosr ...and today, in 21st century, increasing number of websites are unable (unwilling?) to display those images without browsers enabling #Javascript. Oh my, how we have regressed.

#FuckAds

FirefighterGeek :masto:

@dragosr "..MIME someday, maybe" -- aaaagghhhh..

I've spent MONTHS working on code that takes mime format child entity references and round trips them with browser viable html references and back.

Lee Ryman

@dragosr and we still can't reliably reload an img with the same URL, no-cache be damned.

Wraithe

@dragosr

You Maniacs! You blew it up! Ah, damn you! God damn you all to hell!

Bertrand Marne

@dragosr
It is very interesting to read all the discussion about the IMG syntax and to see, in the end, how the current one have been chosen.

1997.webhistory.org/www.lists/

Go Up