@davidaugust@alilly@dotnet They should. Software is a liability, not an asset. We accept software because it solves a problem at lower cost than the alternatives.
In this particular case it seems dotnet.social wants to be independent from Microsoft, so it wouldn't make sense for the instance to move.
For the dotnet account though it makes sense to ask whether the account as a Microsoft account should signal that it is part of the community and be on dotnet.social, or that it should signal that it represents Microsoft and be on a Microsoft server. Both choices make sense depending on what the purpose with the account is.
@davidaugust@alilly@dotnet They should. Software is a liability, not an asset. We accept software because it solves a problem at lower cost than the alternatives.
In this particular case it seems dotnet.social wants to be independent from Microsoft, so it wouldn't make sense for the instance to move.
In this particular case it seems dotnet.social wants to be independent from Microsoft, so it wouldn't make sense for the instance to move.
For the dotnet account though it makes sense to ask whether the account as a Microsoft account should signal that it is part of the community and be on dotnet.social, or that it should signal that it represents Microsoft and be on a Microsoft server. Both choices make sense depending on what the purpose with the account is.
In this particular case it seems dotnet.social wants to be independent from Microsoft, so it wouldn't make sense for the instance to move.