Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
12 comments
Julianoรซ

@gamingonlinux weirdly phrased because that's a decision by Ubuntu, not the flavours designers

Liam @ GamingOnLinux ๐Ÿง๐ŸŽฎ

@Julianoe " the Ubuntu flavors have made a joint decision to adjust some of the default packages on Ubuntu" - the announcement

Diogo Constantino

@gamingonlinux one detail, that is meaningful for the sentiment:
debs and snaps by default as is written on the discourse post.

rustynail

@gamingonlinux sounds surprising to me as someone who hadn't used ubuntu in a while. Why did they even ship with flatpak in the first place if they're literally ubuntu

Arsimael Inshan

@gamingonlinux one of the (main) reasons against snap is Cano ical which refuses to allow other snap store servers. This takes the option to create own snap servers and stores.
Besides this, I think snap is an OK format. Just like Flatpak or Appimage.

airik

@gamingonlinux @cassidy think Iโ€™ll continue avoiding Ubuntu โ€ฆ

Ceremus :t_blink:

@gamingonlinux On the topic of whether it's a "big deal" or not, I'm not so concerned about the OOBE, I'm sure Ubuntu's regular users will be fine either way. But there's a clear, Microsoft-level conflict of interest when you have a company pushing their own proprietary solution while excluding competing technologies of the same kind. It starts to stink of walled-garden mentalities that are mostly antithetical to the FOSS community.

cameronbosch :endeavourOS:

@gamingonlinux And I plan to drop Ubuntu by default and stick to Arch for computers and something not Red Hat or Ubuntu based for servers, maybe Debian or openSUSE...

Go Up