Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
stux⚡

And don't be proud of being a sheep btw, it's not plus but a big minues

Think for youself, don't be a sheep

19 comments
stux⚡

The tag #FediBlock is a SUGGESTION not a RULE!

Check it out for yourself and decide but stop forcing other people to follow your crap

stux⚡

----------------
rant done :blobcatgiggle:
---------------

Alex has moved to @alex@xim.ca

@stux *virtual hugs the ranter* 🐱

Feel better? :)

Ferri-kun

@stux@mstdn.social I'd also like to add that it can hurt your users because it cuts off their own ability to moderate and follow who they feel comfortable with. There are other options outside of blocking.

[DATA EXPUNGED]
Dr. Quadragon ❌

@ZySoua @stux Yes, same.

Although was not subscribed till now, but still - big fan of your work.

Daniel Fisher

@stux I'm blocking you because you don't block instances that block instances that don't block other instances!

stux⚡

@electrafish Oh my god :blobcatgiggle:

is that... is that 'blockception'? :ed_grin:

DELETED

@electrafish
I will block anybody who posts the soup nazi, because that's like a real Nazi

Mark C

@stux Thank you for having sane policies. That’s why I like it here.

Robworks

@stux Yeah, I think it’s definitely a symptom of Purity Spirals. It can definitely happen and people need to look critically at their own ‘tribe’ for evidence of Purity Spiral formation

🇩🇪 くら Woomy (:smug_kura:)

@stux@mstdn.social i deny and replace it with my own: i got zero blocks, though im blocked for eg being edgelord. lol

Justin

@stux 100% this. I don't even follow it. I block accounts or instances once they have broken a rule, not before based on some random half way across the world.

Dr. Quadragon ❌

@stux I honestly am disillusioned with this whole FediBlock thing.

Its intended purpose is protecting the network from known abusers, which is the sentiment I can get behind. But at best it works as a short-term solution, and being overused and the hashtag being thrown around for every tiny slight turns into either a network-breaking menace or a useless farce. Arguing for it further only solidifies the madness and groupthink and perpetuates the farce.

Once you've seen enough, you realize that this can't be viewed as a comprehensive solution, no matter how you cut it.

@stux I honestly am disillusioned with this whole FediBlock thing.

Its intended purpose is protecting the network from known abusers, which is the sentiment I can get behind. But at best it works as a short-term solution, and being overused and the hashtag being thrown around for every tiny slight turns into either a network-breaking menace or a useless farce. Arguing for it further only solidifies the madness and groupthink and perpetuates the farce.

DELETED

@drq @stux there's a lot of instances that are worth blocking, that have been around for a long time. I wouldn't want them to be able to interact with me by default. And I think a lot of people would agree with that as a baseline.

And I don't want to be on, and would not encourage people to be on, an instance that allowed anyone to interact with you.

But blocking an instance solely because you wouldn't want to be there, that doesn't make sense to me.

tl;dr Stux mods good and I support

꧁𝕮𝖊𝖆꧂:blobcatdj:

@drq @stux

Yep.
Like "this person said something I disagree with, you better block em or we can nolonger be #friends "

dafuq ?
Blocking should be the *last* resort.
Not the first :Alcea_Not_Amused_for_real:

swansinflight :excuseme:

@stux oh man I can not agree with this more!

We manually check every block we do, and had another instance mod say they'd block us because our admin follows an account on an instance they dont like. We worked out it was the extremely wholesome skeletor bot, and told them politely to bugger off.

Thank you for saying this.

Go Up