|
Top-level
 I'm not kidding. If you sell your Honda Civic hatchback on Craigslist for cash, cops can take that. If you cash your paycheck, cops can take that. You would need a lawyer that you can't afford, just to get your own money back. Cops stole more stuff from citizens in 2015, than all burglaries in the US combined. So the 2 forms of theft with mostly Black victims, that make up the vast majority of theft, are not even considered crimes. Our definition of theft is arbitrary. 12 comments
This distinction becomes important once we explore how we have arbitrarily decided to define murder. Shooting folk? Murder! Lying about public health data during a pandemic? Not murder! Grifting supplies needed by FEMA? Not murder! Cops shooting unarmed folk in the back? Not murder! So the forms of victimization disproportionately suffered by poor Black folk, don't even register as murder. ๐๐ Even in the highest gun crime cities in the US, there are a *very* small number of shooters doing most of the killing. Typically fewer than 50 killers in a city of millions. But we consider entire cities "high crime" because of them, because they rack up *astronomical* bodycounts. ๐คBut... By astronomical we mean 500 to 1000 murders a year, 80% of which will likely be committed by this pod of killers, most of the victims young, Black, male. But we don't consider *intentional* negligence leading to 10K or 100K deaths, as creating a high crime neighborhood. Of all the things that police do with their billions of dollars of budget, the one thing they don't do well at all, and the one thing that some residents of supposedly high crime communities (AKA, Black communities) would actually want them to do, is stop these pods. But they won't. Dallas PD has a budget of ~$500 MM, and has 3,000 officers and around 500 civilian workers. They only have ~15 homicide detectives. The other 2,985 officers do a lot of policing of "high crime" neighborhoods. Arresting lots of poor Black folk for drugs and other minor crimes. I'm not going into assault, other than to say: If in 2023 your definition of assault is "Men beating up men that they don't know," then I don't know what to tell you. If you know that most assault is "Men harming women that they do know," then no explanation needed. @mekkaokereke @taatm @mekkaokereke @mekkaokereke this. Also, violence is not always physical. Manipulation and coercive control ARE ABUSE and even if he has never hit you, yes, IT DOES COUNT. ๐ Same goes for sexual assault within relationships. You still have the right to say "no." You always have the right to say "no." Walk away when you see the early signs, if you can, before your life is in danger. The red flags don't lie. ๐, someone who trusted the wrong person instead of her gut @mekkaokereke This is not true just for women, it is true for everyone my guy. Ask your local gay where they feel safest. There is only a subset of the population of men that most visibly marginalized groups feel safe around. I know plenty of straight men that are not even comfortable around the lowest common denominator of men. @mekkaokereke Violence is always where men areโฆsadly and not all men. I celebrate kind people no matter their gender. Women are just more nurturing, while both can be violent itโs not normally in a womenโs nature. Gun violence in America is mostly by men, not sure of the statistics since many of the studies leave out the gender part but when you look at the break down closer it is in the 95% for mass shootings. |
Gregory's Server
OK, but what about murder? Clearly there are more murders committed in "high crime" areas?
Again, it depends on our definition of murder and even our definition of location. If I stand on block A, and shoot someone across the street on block B, where did the crime occur? A or B?
Do we define murder as where the body fell? Or where the shooter pulled the trigger? Victim focused? Or killer focused?