If you "feed it" with the books you want it to cite, then it has a chance of doing what you want https://write.as/jk40o8rhd3hp8
But if you ask it to write then cite then it's generally not right https://pastebin.com/Yipmcb01
Top-level
If you "feed it" with the books you want it to cite, then it has a chance of doing what you want https://write.as/jk40o8rhd3hp8 But if you ask it to write then cite then it's generally not right https://pastebin.com/Yipmcb01 4 comments
@highvizghilliesuit @edaross @malwaretech I do note that it fesses up to being trained on āconfidential and proprietary information,ā which isnāt a good look given all the copyright issues surrounding these models. The question is was it actually trained on that, or is it just saying that as it seems to be the most likely thing it should say at the time? |
@edaross @malwaretech That's slightly frustrating but makes sense. To have it be able to cite its sources it would need to retain its entire training corpus, which would be likely impractical and also present an even harrier copyright situation than what we're presently wittnessing w/r/t AI. Am I understanding correctly?