Gregory's Server@RL_Dane @simon_lucy @jaredwhite @jamescridland I don’t disagree. My point is argue against exclusivity itself. Don’t argue semantics on terminology
|
2 comments
@RL_Dane @simon_lucy @jaredwhite it’s a nice ideal, I just don’t think it’s particularly pragmatic. Good luck tho! |
@bed
But even the semantics are a bloody corporate PsyOp. :blobcatverysad:
If the corporations think it's important enough to pour millions into re-defining a word, is that definition then inherently worth fighting for? I certainly think so.
I'm not even necessary anti-capitalist; I'm seeing where things are heading and I'm responding with one big fat "Aw hail no."
Corporate efforts toward digital hegemony doth make digital socialists of us all.
Or digital chattel.
@simon_lucy @jaredwhite
@bed
But even the semantics are a bloody corporate PsyOp. :blobcatverysad:
If the corporations think it's important enough to pour millions into re-defining a word, is that definition then inherently worth fighting for? I certainly think so.
I'm not even necessary anti-capitalist; I'm seeing where things are heading and I'm responding with one big fat "Aw hail no."