Gregory's Server@zalintyre @samir a site that serves static webpages with publicly accessible content has no need for the safety provisions of HTTPS and it's safer than an HTTPS site you have to log in to and whose credentials database got hacked.
|
Top-level
 @zalintyre @samir a site that serves static webpages with publicly accessible content has no need for the safety provisions of HTTPS and it's safer than an HTTPS site you have to log in to and whose credentials database got hacked. 1 comment
|
@zalintyre @samir you can get worms delivered to you by the Google ad network via HTTPS, and you won't have anything to fear from a plain HTTP site serving static content