Cory Doctorow

Long thread/31

This tooling was once the subject of intense development and innovation, but all that research fell by the wayside with the rise of platforms, who are actively hostile to third party mods that gave users more control over their feeds:

https://techcrunch.com/2022/09/27/og-app-promises-you-an-ad-free-instagram-feed/

Alas, lawmakers are way behind the curve on this, demanding new "online safety" rules that *require* firms to break E2E *and* block third-party de-enshittification tools:

https://www.openrightsgroup.org/blog/online-safety-made-dangerous/

31/

Like 10 Dec 2022 at 15:27 | Open on mamot.fr

9 comments

Cory Doctorow replied to Cory

Long thread/32

The online free speech debate is stupid because it has all the wrong focuses:

* Focusing on improving algorithms, not whether you can even *get* a feed of things you asked to see;

* Focusing on whether unsolicited messages are delivered, not whether *solicited* messages reach their readers;

* Focusing on algorithmic transparency rather, not whether you can opt out of the behavioral tracking that produces training data for algorithms;

32/

10 Dec 2022 at 15:27 | Open on mamot.fr

Cory Doctorow replied to Cory

Long thread/33

* Focusing on whether platforms are policing their users well enough, not whether we can leave a platform without losing our important social, professional and personal ties;

* Focusing on whether the limits on our speech violate the First Amendment, rather than whether they are unfair:

https://doctorow.medium.com/yes-its-censorship-2026c9edc0fd

33/

10 Dec 2022 at 15:27 | Open on mamot.fr

Cory Doctorow replied to Cory

Long thread/34

The wholly artificial distinction between "freedom of speech" and "freedom of reach" is just more self-serving nonsense and the only reason we're talking about it is that a billionaire dilettante would like to create chokepoints so he can extract payola from his users and meet his debt obligations to the Saudi royal family.

34/

10 Dec 2022 at 15:28 | Open on mamot.fr

Cory Doctorow replied to Cory

Long thread/eof

Billionaire dilettantes have their own stupid definitions of all kinds of important words like "freedom" and "discrimination" and "free speech." Remember: these definitions have *nothing* to do with how the world's 7,999,997,332 non-billionaires experience these concepts.

Image:
Cryteria (modified)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HAL9000.svg

CC BY 3.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en

William Shaw Antliff (modified)
https://www.macleans.ca/history/this-canadian-private-wrote-and-saved-hundreds-of-letters-during-the-first-world-war/

Public domain
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_law_of_Canada#Posthumous_works

eof/

Image:
Cryteria (modified)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HAL9000.svg

Expand text...

10 Dec 2022 at 15:28 | Open on mamot.fr

javitel replied to Cory

Long thread/eof

@pluralistic is there a tool for this app that puts together a thread that you can then share outside the app? Sort of like threadreaderapp.com did for the bird site?