@Gusted @dachary @humanetech “I’m looking for VC money, a few millions” – this, combined with the announcement yesterday, actually has me more worried.
It shows that either Lunny doesn’t understand what VC is or that there’s a desire to make a lot of money with Gitea in a way that isn’t compatible with being a community project.
“Enterprise version” plans are not great either. Just look at GitLab.
CodeBerg might want to consider sustaining their own fork while the codebase is still simple.
@aral
> “Enterprise version” plans are not great either.
I agree that they often haven't been. Perhaps because they've been approached as a way to generate monopoly profits, so source code for them is kept secret (either not published and therefore subject to trade secret protection not copyright), or published under a non-free license. But in practice, large orgs have different hosting needs from small ones, and having separate versions can address that.
@Gusted @dachary @humanetech
@aral
> “Enterprise version” plans are not great either.
I agree that they often haven't been. Perhaps because they've been approached as a way to generate monopoly profits, so source code for them is kept secret (either not published and therefore subject to trade secret protection not copyright), or published under a non-free license. But in practice, large orgs have different hosting needs from small ones, and having separate versions can address that.