Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Jason Lefkowitz

It’s also why CloudFlare’s current line is “yes we do business with loathsome people, but when we do, we offset it by donating to progressive causes.”

1) CF already burns money, nobody there is going to sweat about burning a little more

2) The money they spend now will be more than made up when they reach the goal of being the internet’s official man in the middle. Which they can’t reach if they turn lots of clients away.

It’s the progressive-politics version of greenwashing. They’re happy to spend a little more today, if by doing so it will shut people up long enough for them to seize the monopoly position they’re gunning for. And then it won’t matter what you think of them, because you’ll have to pay them regardless just to go about your life online

4 comments
Luci for dyeing

@jalefkowit they’re in for a shock when no one who knows they shield nazis wants to do business with them

Luci for dyeing

@jalefkowit also i seem to remember that they’re funded by the CIA

Jason Lefkowitz

@zens I don't see them in the In-Q-Tel portfolio, but I would not put it past the CIA to not put all their investments on their web site 😆​

iqt.org/portfolio/

Emacsen

@jalefkowit

I agree with everything you've said, but the trouble is, for those of us who have legitimate needs for DDOS protection on sites, they are really the only game in town that offers all the features that (at least I) need.

I spent weeks checking others, and no one else offers websocket protection.

Go Up