@cancel That's not how this article ends tho, the author just says they don't know where to go from there.
Top-level
@cancel That's not how this article ends tho, the author just says they don't know where to go from there. 4 comments
@cancel it does say this: "Maybe we need a new movement (or revisit past ideas from the 70s) that focuses on ensuring the openness regarding freedoms of computing (😉) that combat proprietary SaaS offerings? idk." And I think they're unused that there's much worth revisiting these ideas, ends with I don't know. @cancel with NoScript the page looks a bit funky. "developing open language tooling for each community where Microsoft has forked the communities over to proprietary language servers" MS reading like, YESSS, more flags to capture |
@neauoire that's exactly how it ends, though:
"Gitpod has already partially resolved the marketplace problem for the Visual Studio Code open-source ecosystem by creating the OpenVSX project and gifting it to the eclipse foundation
but the biggest challenge for Gitpod, Datacoves, OpenBB, Foam, et al lies ahead - developing open language tooling for each community where Microsoft has forked the communities over to proprietary language servers..."