Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
tommy

@yogthos what about dissidents? the starvation crisis to transform the country to an industrialized country? nothing against communism but against dictatorship and authoritarianism

7 comments
Yogthos

@tommy I'm comparing it to the alternatives available in the real world as opposed to some Utopian fantasy anarchists keep pining for without showing any way to get there.

Nobody is claiming USSR was perfect in any way, but it did improve lives for millions of people while it existed.

It also continued to become more egalitarian throughout its existence. USSR of the late 80s was nothing like USSR in the 50s.

Meanwhile, here' what capitalism gets you

horizons-newspaper.com/index.p

@tommy I'm comparing it to the alternatives available in the real world as opposed to some Utopian fantasy anarchists keep pining for without showing any way to get there.

Nobody is claiming USSR was perfect in any way, but it did improve lives for millions of people while it existed.

It also continued to become more egalitarian throughout its existence. USSR of the late 80s was nothing like USSR in the 50s.

Yogthos

@tommy a bit ironic that you're the one accusing me of one dimensional thinking here while being unable to comprehend that USSR was a net positive for humanity despite being flawed

tommy

@yogthos "net positive" is quite one dimensional. You can only decide on a one dimensional scale if something was positive or not.

Yogthos

@tommy it's literally the opposite of what one dimensional means. It means that there was both good and bad in USSR, and the good outweighed the bad.

I guess can't expect reading comprehension from an anarchist.

tommy

@yogthos to compute net positivity you have to weight different aspects to add them as numbers. You decide the weight. It is your measure to reduce multi demensional complexity to one criteria "net positivity".

And nice move to start insulting. ;)

tommy

@yogthos did I wrote anything in favor of capitalism or why are you coming up with it again an again?

Yogthos

@tommy by rejecting workable alternatives you implicitly support the status quo

Go Up