Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Lukas

@funkylab

@azonenberg @gsuberland the cursed thing about USB4v2 is that it uses PAM3 on the physical layer.

4 comments
Andrew Zonenberg

@karotte @funkylab @gsuberland Yes, PAM3 is annoying.

Especially because ~nothing COTS can do PAM3 so there's no hope of speaking it with an FPGA transceiver etc.

jaseg

@azonenberg @karotte @funkylab @gsuberland just out of curiosity, what stops you from configuring the transceivers to PAM-4 and then just not using either the top or the bottom level? Do you get into trouble with level symmetry?

Andrew Zonenberg

@jaseg @karotte @funkylab @gsuberland For TX, I think it would work.

For RX, I think you'd run into problems with asymmetry and the baseline wander correction putting your thresholds in the wrong place.

Andrew Zonenberg

@jaseg @karotte @funkylab @gsuberland (also even PAM4 transceivers are really rare, only like the biggest virtexes have them right now)

Go Up