 The last few years I've seen a dramatic increase in ActivityPub adoption in open but also closed software Often community made plugins that allow a self hosted blog, forum or whatever to be directly connected to the Fediverse I've not seen this happening for Bluesky so far and one still has to create a "3rd party" account for connecting your site to the network Something a lot of people on bluesky don't seem to notice 5 comments
 @stux not trying to be rude but I just get annoyed when I see all this stuff on mastodon about anti-bsky/atproto there’s tons of other atproto apps & Bluesky apps/tools too (atproto and Bluesky are different things!)   The reason why it happens is simple. The architecture of Bluesky discourages this sort of thing (good luck hosting a node) while the architecture of the fediverse, on the contrary, encourages it (three simple endpoints, one database table, activity sender, and you're good). |
Gregory's Server
@stux ActivityPub was made in what, 2010?
atproto still doesn’t have an official V1.0