@chx @trebach @stevel @tobi @stux
I had to look up Collateral Estoppel, so.
#TIL about Non-Mutual-Defensive #CollateralEstoppel where by "a defendant attempts to prevent a plaintiff from re-litigating an issue that was previously decided against the plaintiff in another lawsuit against a different party."
To put it another way, if Mr. Denke's defense was successful, and ruled on in his case, then Monster Cable couldn't attempt to use that failed issue against a different cable manufacturer when Monster Cable sued them for alleged Patent and Trade dress infringement.
@chx @trebach @stevel @tobi @stux
I did some digging and apparently Monster Cable sent a Cease & Desist for infringing on "Design Patents" so I looked one of the claimed ones up.
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/72/50/df/98f61250b428b5/USD456363.pdf
It is just a drawing, not a unique idea.
"Design patents represent nothing more that that: design. There is no technological content within design patents. The net effect is that Monster cable suing Blue Jeans is like you suing someone who copied the custom paint job on your car."
#Source
https://www.audioholics.com/news/monster-sues-blue-jeans-cable
@chx @trebach @stevel @tobi @stux
I did some digging and apparently Monster Cable sent a Cease & Desist for infringing on "Design Patents" so I looked one of the claimed ones up.
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/72/50/df/98f61250b428b5/USD456363.pdf
It is just a drawing, not a unique idea.