Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
vozy ๐ŸŽ€

source: forbes.com/sites/paultassi/202

the article actually goes on to say that it would be silly to make the conclusion that Among Us had anything to do with the motive, emphasizing it's cartoony nature

What is left out of the coverage is an examination of what Among Us actually is, an exceptionally cartoony, overwhelmingly comedic game.

4 comments
wavejumper3

@vozercozer Luigi was the type of person that identifies the imposter immediately, but then gets ejected by a slim majority because the imposter's slightly more charismatic on the surface and everyone really regrets it at the end

vozy ๐ŸŽ€

i implore everyone to actually read the article before making an assumption that it was written in bad faith. i am considering deleting the OP merely because i donโ€™t want to be responsible for spreading unwarranted misinformation

Pomegranate_Stew

@vozercozer
I think Iโ€™m more flabbergasted that an article like this even needs to be written.

Youโ€™re all good.

jackdaw, ultranormal aspect

@vozercozer

in all seriousness Forbes is like the only large legacy publication that seems to have people who take video games as an industry seriously. I don't know when exactly it happened, some time in the last decade, but it seems to actually allow millennial ass writers talk normally about games in their content.

Go Up