Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Mark Wyner :vm:

This is perfect. We humans tend to center ourselves in everything. This is true with animals, land, and even other people.

Source: @anna_lillith (posted fresh to include full alt text).

#Humans #Humanity #Animals #Nature #Philosophy

Old grainy photo of two young dear crossing and grazing by an empty two-lane road that winds through a small forest. Overlaid text reads β€˜the deer aren’t crossing the road, the road is crossing the forest.’
10 comments
Mick Pyro Official :verified:

@markwyner @anna_lillith
The deers are crossing the road.
The road is crossing the forest.

Both facts are true. None is superior to the other.

Paved road or dirt road doesn't change any of this 2 facts.

In any case, you slow down (even with a bike -not even speaking of a motorbike), give them and you space, and continue to your merry way. It's not hard.

Corin Ashwell 🌍 🌿 πŸ„

@mickpyro @markwyner @anna_lillith the change in emphasis by different use of language is exactly the point of this post though. It's not about the 'facts' it's about the framing. Most people would say the picture showed "deer crossing a road". The interesting thing is to re-think it from the perspective that "the road is crossing the forest". That is a novel re-framing of the scene. Not the 'facts' but how it makes us re-think humans in the context of the rest of nature is the point.

Peter S. L. Schmuttermaier

@mickpyro And still, many deers get hit unnecessarily all the time. Although you are correct with your assessment that both of your mentioned claims are true, I think the intention of the post is to shift our view from a human-centered to a nature-centered one. We tend to see the deer as the annoyance, when we are actually cutting through their habitat for our convenience.

Lance

@markwyner @anna_lillith Whenever someone says they hit a deer, they're more concerned about the state of their vehicle than the deer. I'm always more interested in the condition of the deer. Cars can be repaired.

Peter S. L. Schmuttermaier

@markwyner @anna_lillith
This reminds me of the etymology of the German word "Bahn", which translates to the English "track". It probably derived from the Indoeuropean root "*bhen-", which means "to hit" or "to wound/injure". There are related words in other Germanic languages:
Gothic "Banja" (deadly blow, wound, ulcer)
Old Norse "ben" (wound)
Old English "benn" (wound)
Old High German "bano" (manslayer, murderer)
Middle High German "ban(e)" (death, perdition)
And even in Avestan (Proto-Persian) the word "banta-" means "sick".

My point is, that in ancient times, roads and pathways through nature were considered wounds and injuries, struck by humans. And if we step back a little and think about it - that's what they are. I am not advocating for the removal of all roads, but we might want to ask ourselves if more roads are really a necessity in our picture of the future, and if we even want to build back some of them as traffic gets transformed into something more sustainable.

Source: dwds.de/wb/Bahn#etymwb-1

@markwyner @anna_lillith
This reminds me of the etymology of the German word "Bahn", which translates to the English "track". It probably derived from the Indoeuropean root "*bhen-", which means "to hit" or "to wound/injure". There are related words in other Germanic languages:
Gothic "Banja" (deadly blow, wound, ulcer)
Old Norse "ben" (wound)
Old English "benn" (wound)
Old High German "bano" (manslayer, murderer)
Middle High German "ban(e)" (death, perdition)
And even in Avestan (Proto-Persian)...

Piousunyn

@markwyner @anna_lillith "We humans tend to center ourselves in everything." One can clearly see this with people like Musk and Trump, preforming their power and greed, trickle down program.

Go Up