Gregory's ServerHot take: if you wrote a test and it never broke, you didn’t need that test
 3 comments
 @nikitonsky we had a system at a previous job that kept track and then stopped running them on every PR. (They would still run over night though.)  @nikitonsky I often write tests just to confirm that something works the way I expect it to before moving on. Once it's written, I tend to just leave it. If I'm working on Clojure I do that kind of quick test in the REPL, but I'm usually not working in Clojure. |
@nikitonsky Hm...isn't it the same as saying:
"If you never crash with your car, you won't need that seatbelt."
It's all about probability and reducing risk. You never know beforehand what might happen.