Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
kel

@aku @Mastodon

The first part is interesting and useful thanks!

The last two points, I am, already aware of thanks again!

The last one is why I like Mastodon, it allows for everyone to find their space and keeps the policing decentralised and accountable within it's own structures and relationships. Is it perfect? No! Is it better than one person having absolute control - hell yeah!! It feels more natural. I am asking what it needs beyond this, I guess?

5 comments
alien

@kel @Mastodon I think they need funds to develop better moderation tools or something like that and also to keep the code more to general people, not to those of capital owners. You know, sometimes, if the software becomes too big, some venture will try to gain profit from it, which made sense since their mission is to make a profit.

Other than that, I don't know what they intend to do; at least, that's what I got after reading that link.

kel

@aku @Mastodon

Yes, I see what you mean!

I was led to believe that this immutability was already enshrined in some legal contract somewhere, but I may be mistaken.

alien

@kel @Mastodon :frog_think: I wish like that

recent example ... :y_ehm: Mozilla it was
“People before profits”
at least until 2022
techcrunch.com/2022/11/02/mozi

Until
reddit.com/r/browsers/comments

mozilla.org/en-US/advertising/
"Reach valuable audiences in premium, privacy-first, brand-safe environments with Mozilla’s suite of ad solutions."

So yeah ... I agree with you it should be in the legal contract somewhere.

I understand

@aku @kel @Mastodon

Ventures do make profit from it. Truth Social is using Mastodon software.

alien

@i_understand @kel @Mastodon Well, I hope they will donate some money to Mastodon since they are actively using it.

Go Up