Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
fontenot

@cwebber

One thing I didn't think to say in the above is that you can imagine a distributed ledger for did:plc and the relay - which doesn't currently exist. If one did exist, then there would be a practical way to keep Bluesky honest.

Bsky proponents seem to think that Bluesky is meant to behave *as if* did:plc and the relay were like this, and if they start misbehaving you can fork the network.

But the fact that Bsky doesn't, and *can't*, be neutral throws a wrench into this.

1 comment
fontenot replied to fontenot

@cwebber

I would summarize my view by saying that Bsky is semi-decentralized but NOT federated. It's a model of publishing akin to RSS, with the AppView serving as Google Reader / Feedly equivalent.

And like Feedly / Inoreader, Bsky adds a bunch of *centralized* features on top of "RSS", which complicates the term "decentralized".

The problem for Bsky is that RSS is not a social network, and the most "social" of Bsky's features (e.g. global search, DMs) are therefore the most centralized.

Go Up