Gregory's Server@moira It may be a lot of money for you or me, but it’s relatively inexpensive for someone trusted like Cloudflare or the Internet Archive to run. The intent was never for everyone to run their own separate relay, or for individual users to manage them.
|
6 comments
 @moira The thing is, if bsky the company is behaving well, there's really no *need* for a second relay right now. if they go rogue, having the ability for the community, or some other org, or anybody else to stand up a replacement is a huge win. even just a partial relay for specific types of events, which the devs have said is fully supported and something they would expect instead of full relays, would be useful. but there's no need to use the fire escape unless there's a fire.  @MikeBeas ...you say that like it's _easy_. hooooooooly shit it's not that will be an _adventure_. It will be much harder and take much longer than I think you think. But at least it will be possible, so at least there is that. @moira luckily it doesn't need to happen right now, but i suspect if it did, you would probably see a coordinate effort in the community to get one up and running as quickly as possible. there are already a number of apps besides bluesky using the protocol, so people do have an interest in keeping the network alive. @MikeBeas I'm sorry that "identity still centralised" was kinda mean on my part. I mean, I'm not wrong, but in real terms it's basically "DNS for AT Proto Social Media" and I just look forward to all the old jokes about DNS being repurposed for use whenever something with PLC is fucked up. xD @moira dns is a very good system! lol but technically they do support did:web alongside did:plc. you have to set it up yourself, and because your did is your permanent identity, you can't migrate between methods, but it is supported and there are a few people in the production bluesky network using it right now. |
@MikeBeas Oh gods no don't try to make users run/be their own relays, that way lies Nostr terrorism and I don't think _anyone_ wants that shit.
Including me, for the record. I'm not some crypto-Nostrite. xD
Well, okay. If you start seeing legitimate numbers of organisations actually _doing this_ - setting up Relays that people can use - then I'll start considering it a ... _reasonably_ distributed network. How's that?
But _until that happens_, it's just theory. Closer to realisation than I had been lead to believe, absolutely! And that matters.
But... still theory.
(And few of my reservations about Relays as requirements go anywhere, of course. It still just feels like moving the ball around instead.)
(Also identity still centralised)
@MikeBeas Oh gods no don't try to make users run/be their own relays, that way lies Nostr terrorism and I don't think _anyone_ wants that shit.
Including me, for the record. I'm not some crypto-Nostrite. xD
Well, okay. If you start seeing legitimate numbers of organisations actually _doing this_ - setting up Relays that people can use - then I'll start considering it a ... _reasonably_ distributed network. How's that?