Gregory's Server@pluralistic has a strong anti-Bluesky argument:
 5 comments
@stpaultim @pluralistic Bluesky is the very first word in the title? But of course the argument applies more broadly. @j12t "Bluesky lacks the one federated feature that is absolutely necessary for me to trust it: the ability to leave Bluesky and go to another host and continue to talk to the people I've entered into community with there." -- @pluralistic  @j12t @pluralistic in short, IIUC: "[[Bluesky]] lacks the one federated feature that is absolutely necessary for me to trust it: the ability to leave Bluesky and go to another host and continue to talk to the people I've entered into community with there. (...) A federation of multiple servers, each a peer to the other, has been on Bluesky's roadmap for as long as I've been following it, but they haven't (yet) delivered it." |
@j12t @pluralistic
Based upon my read. The article is very specifically not specific to BlueSky. It's anti corporate social media, with BlueSky as an example.
It's still good.