@jaffathecake Is <option> continue to be text...

Jake's posts Post Back to profile

Top-level

Timothy Chien

@jaffathecake Is <option> continue to be text only? If so, it should be easy to duplicate the text in <selectedoption>.

Speak from my brief experience as an implementer, anything resembling <svg:use> opens a rather big can of worms.

Like 20 October at 5:53 | Wall-to-wall | Open on mastodon.social

2 comments

Jake Archibald

@timdream <option> is no longer text only

20 October at 6:03 | Open on mastodon.social

Timothy Chien

@jaffathecake Got it. I hope by piggy backing on node.cloneNode(true) for the initial clone it would be less problematic than <svg:use> a <svg:foreignObject>. That was a memorable bug from fuzzying team 😅.

The first option is not ergonomic IMO.

The last option is ... creative, not sure if it is achievable given the level of effort.

Speak of, why not generalize the light-DOM-deep-clone behavior? Maybe we should ship a `<html:clonefrom>` element instead 😝?

20 October at 6:41 | Open on mastodon.social