Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Jon Het-CIS.

@quinsibell @KathleenC @petrosyan @publictorsten LOOK at the output as a stand alone piece, and tell me what is objectionable about it. The phrase "highly sexualized" indicates to me that you have not seen the photo.

I think many people commenting on this thread have not seen the photo, and therefore fail to understand what this discussion IS. This leap to vilify a woman who was just attempting to do her job the best way she could is... petty.

And I am done with it.

3 comments
Auld Ma Twəgg

@Jon_Kramer the woman who's face it was objected to it. At the very least edited photos require approval. Like I said, I couldn't get away with this conduct prior to AI image generators. Someone selected and posted the image. They are responsible.

Jon Het-CIS.

@quinsibell Great. Now go look at the picture and tell me what is objectionable.

Don't get back to me, I'm done with this idiotic conversation about nothing.

Auld Ma Twəgg

@Jon_Kramer it doesn't matter what I consider objectionable. A photo was edited and distributed in a way that the person in the photo objected to without consultation.

Go Up