@amckinstry There's one reason I might have detected this without looking closer: The smaller square is at the top left instead of the bottom right (which of course doesn't make it unreadable, it's only upside-down from the usual orientation)
Top-level
@amckinstry There's one reason I might have detected this without looking closer: The smaller square is at the top left instead of the bottom right (which of course doesn't make it unreadable, it's only upside-down from the usual orientation) 3 comments
|
@waltertross
Which just happened because the scammer missed that though? They could have easily placed it in the "correct" (aka conventional) way?
@amckinstry