@NanoRaptor There aren't enough DAT drives in that for my liking.
I loved DAT... but it just didn't have the capacity.
Top-level
@NanoRaptor There aren't enough DAT drives in that for my liking. I loved DAT... but it just didn't have the capacity. 8 comments
@devxvda @NanoRaptor At one point, I had a 12-tape DDS-2 changer, and a couple of DDS-3 drives. I never worked out how to fit one of the DDS-3 drives into the case of the DDS-2 changer mechanism. I still have a tape drive (LTO-5), but I changed the controller and it now runs about as fast as a modem, which really sucks. I should get some help on that one of these days. @darkling @NanoRaptor LTO-5 was the last version of tape I used! The capacity of LTO-9 is obscene in comparison @darkling @NanoRaptor 100 EUR per tape versus 35 EUR? /gen IIRC LTO-5 was circa 100 EUR a tape back in 2012. @devxvda @NanoRaptor I was thinking more of the cost of the drives. I got my LTO-5 for about £800 on eBay, I think. That was a few years ago. The later generations ramp up in price very quickly. @devxvda @darkling @NanoRaptor I used LTO-1 at 200 USD per tape back in 2004-2005 timeframe. You're right, with 3 DAT drives, you could use RAIT5, and get improved error handling and still get good capacity efficiency. |
@darkling @NanoRaptor DAT was great. I have the same fondness for DAT as I do for SCART.
I love SCART. Thick. Chunky. Reliable. No fucking about.