@tara Isn't reading 1 MB of random data a little excessive for creating a 160 bits (20 bytes) hash?
@mkj, perhaps yes. I thought that increasing the size would generate even more random data for a more unique hash, but maybe it's not that true. It was meant to be for me, not that I use it every second.
Gregory's Server
@mkj, perhaps yes. I thought that increasing the size would generate even more random data for a more unique hash, but maybe it's not that true. It was meant to be for me, not that I use it every second.