|
Top-level
 If it did that, yes. But it doesn't. This is a standard Google result showing a matching source for the search terms supplied. It doesn't "imply" anything, it's just the best matching response because the search terms are totally out-there. I *hate* AI with a vengeance but claiming a standard result is "AI" is not helpful to anyone 3 comments
Completely different issue, we always have to check our own sources using a search as a starting point. In my opinion, this does really require a background understanding of the issue in the first place. The usual thinking people have is that "everything on the internet is a lie unless it agrees with my preconceived ideas." And there's not a lot we can do about that - except encourage better critical thinking. @adaddinsane @paninid Sure it's a different issue and I agree with all your remarks. I still think that pulling that content out of the page and putting it directly on top makes it look like "Google's answer" and will keep some from searching further. |
Gregory's Server
@adaddinsane @paninid OK, I see. I rarely use Google, so I missed the nuance here.
Don't you think the issue remains? What if I searched for election fraud? Which kind of articles would it condense into smth that looks like Google's answer to the question?