Gregory's Server@trwnh I use the word platform because everything with an interoperable inbox is a "messaging platform" and everything which has the concept of a thread is a forum platform and everything with listenable content is an "audio platform" and anything with public, readable content is a "publishing platform" but no one assumes you have to be all those things to be an AP implementation...
|
3 comments
 @trwnh all of which is just to posit that maybe the "social" part allows a certain "closed world" assumption to creep in (and a lot of scope creep!) because identity is infrastructure and people think it's easy to "standardize" social norms globally. anyways, send me the blog post when you push it, or before!  @by_caballero the blog post is basically just gonna be this thread but formatted in html with headings, so you're not missing much lol. maybe will be up by tomorrow, still need to decide on the uri, probably gonna create an /unstable directory for things that might get moved out later |
@trwnh ...and yet somehow many people DO implicitly or perhaps even unwittingly expect the "identity layer" for all of this to somehow be easier to harmonize than the content itself, w/E2EE and moderation/blocking guarantees universally applicable, and even expects the many shades of grey between public and private to be "standardizable" [sic] across all form factors and platforms. so yeah, maybe the singular framing of "the fediverse" is the problem, but also a bit of economic fingers-in-ears