@stefano Exactly. All critical data should be held...

@stefano
Exactly.
All critical data should be held locally as primary, and clouds should be for backups and shares. If making cloud as primary, multiple physical connections with different routes should be always kept, if the data there is "critical".

Like 10 September at 16:15 | Wall-to-wall | Open on mastodon.bsd.cafe

6 comments

Kevin Russell

@TomAoki @stefano

There are rules that can be followed, but medical records for 51 million people do not need to be stored at every hospital.

Your point is a start.

10 September at 16:32 | Open on mstdn.social

TomAoki

@kevinrns @stefano
Of course, single hospital doesn't need to host and manage records of other hospitals. But keeping their own patients' records locally as primary AND backing up in real time to (shared governmental) cloud would be wanted.
With this, they can access to their records even when external connections are lost and safe keep their records for hazards.

10 September at 16:42 | Open on mastodon.bsd.cafe

Kevin Russell

@TomAoki @stefano

Yep. Good rules can be made, they have not been made.

Seeing military organisations running Windows 95 is terrifying.

10 September at 16:49 | Open on mstdn.social

Evannakita

@TomAoki @kevinrns @stefano A shared governmental cloud does worry me considering the recent efforts by some Republican governors to obtain the medical records of trans people, though.

10 September at 19:24 | Open on mastodon.online

Stefano Marinelli

@kevinrns @TomAoki of course, there's no need to keep the records for all the people. But at least the ones being treated by that specific ward

10 September at 17:56 | Open on mastodon.bsd.cafe

Kevin Russell

@stefano @TomAoki

My main point is the complex protections and needs have NOT been accounted for, the continuation of providing service despite computational sctewups has not been met, or studied.

Its a complete dogs breakfast.

10 September at 18:34 | Open on mstdn.social

Go Up