Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Michael T. Richter

@PJ_Evans @pleaseclap @hobbsc @hailey No, you misunderstoon me. I said "stop falling for billionaire lies", not "continue perpetuating billionaire lies".

I know the difference is subtle, but see if you can tell them apart.

9 comments
hobbsc

@qqmrichter @PJ_Evans @pleaseclap @hailey there's no need for argument here, y'all. be excellent to each other.

Michael T. Richter

@hobbsc @PJ_Evans @pleaseclap @hailey An argument would imply two people who know what they're talking about speaking.

One person in this exchange cannot distinguish between "infringement" and "theft" and is unequipped to have an actual argument.

Shell :fedora: :kde:

@hobbsc @qqmrichter @PJ_Evans @pleaseclap @hailey It's really funny and sad at the same time how they're constantly trying to appear nonchalant and one-up each other with phrases such as "sweetcheeks" lol

hp

@shellheim

Is it then also funny and sad how you're one-upping both of them by condescending with descriptions like "funny and sad" and laughing about them?

Shell :fedora: :kde:

@hp If I say no then that would be one-upping you, so I am trapped in this loop!

You seem to have bested me stranger! AAAAAHHHHH

hp replied to Shell :fedora: :kde:

@shellheim The trick is to only imply the one-upping by asking passive-aggressive questions!

Michael T. Richter

@PJ_Evans @pleaseclap @hobbsc @hailey Sweetcheeks, see if you can tell me the difference between "infringement" and "theft" and why they are entirely different terms in the legal sphere.

(Hint: no you can't, apparently, since you're still babbling nonsense.)

P J Evans

@qqmrichter@mastodon.world @pleaseclap @hobbsc @hailey
READ MY COMMENT. It wasn't about infringement (which I understand just fine, tyvm). IT was about them LENDING OUT BOOKS THEY DIDN'T EVEN OWN.

Go Up