@avuton Wanting the "perfect API" is the trick these anti-Rust people use to stall things... ;;

Like they think it's the Rust team's job to fix the existing lifetime/recounting messes of the kernel before they're allowed to introduce safe APIs... even though an imperfect Rust abstraction that leaks some unsoundness in corner cases (due to underlying C problems or design) is still better than literally no Rust code at all and writing more C code...