I don't disagree on principle. But I do think that it's worth remembering that what you call "purity testing" is sometimes the result of hypervigilance.
I also think the language "purity test" is...not the best. It belittles their position and their reaction in ways that scream "privileged" to me, because the more marginalized you are the less wiggle room you've got for "live and let live" attitudes.
@johnzajac I don't find this to be true at all! I've always found that people who have been victimized and Othered, who are part of out groups, are more likely to extend understanding to people. Don't mistake purity testing for having and asserting boundaries (particularly with outsiders) or standing firm around values, these are not the same thing and purity testing happens within marginalized groups too and is equally toxic within the group. To be clear, purity testing isn't about discussing and maintaining values. @kissane
@johnzajac I don't find this to be true at all! I've always found that people who have been victimized and Othered, who are part of out groups, are more likely to extend understanding to people. Don't mistake purity testing for having and asserting boundaries (particularly with outsiders) or standing firm around values, these are not the same thing and purity testing happens within marginalized groups too and is equally toxic within the group. To be clear, purity testing isn't about discussing and...