Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Dr. Quadragon ❌

@yogthos Just to play Devil's advocate:

What are the alternatives?

XMPP might be, but they haven't been able to get their shit together for a decade and a half regarding... well, everything. Jabber is in shambles, especially regarding E2EE:

soatok.blog/2024/08/04/against

Matrix just has awful protocol design that crumbles under its own weight. Don't believe me? Try visiting #matrix:matrix.org.

So... We're kinda screwed, aren't we.

8 comments
Artёm

@drq @yogthos joining #matrix:matrix.org took 2 roughly seconds. Nothing special for the MUC of 62K people.

Dr. Quadragon ❌

@krom Well, that explains it.

Try joining from another server. Preferably, from some server you don't particularly like. They don't call this room "a server killer" for nothing.

@yogthos

Yogthos

@drq I'd say it really depends on your threat profile, for vast majority of people it really doesn't matter all that much.

Honestly, the best practice is to just not do any sensitive communication online in the first place.

I'd also argue if you do want to do that then running your own server for people you know personally might be the best option.

Being in control of the server removes the concern about e2ee as well.

Brahn

@drq @yogthos everyone overlooks Wire. It's signal protocol without the registration requirements, and it doesn't store your decryption key in plain text on desktop!

Dmitri | 🇺🇦

@drq @yogthos Re "what are the alternatives", as far as I can tell, Quiet (tryquiet.org/ ) for group chats, but also cwtch.im/ for everything else.

Dr. Quadragon ❌

@dmitri Yeah. P2P stuff.

It always semi- kinda- works- ish.

Until you get into multiple devices and offline messaging.

That's where you start storing state, and p2p networks are famously horrible at it.

And people expect those.

@yogthos

Go Up