Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
SwiftOnSecurity's posts Post Back to profile
Top-level
iam-py-test :unverified:

@SpaceLifeForm Privacy Badger does conflict (though I can't remember any specific instances off the top of my head).
Also, in my opinion PB is fairly redundant when used with uBo; most browsers have cookie controls and global privacy control, and the blocking is just rules (the learning has been disabled due to security concerns).
Thanks

19 August at 21:51 | Wall-to-wall | Open on infosec.exchange
8 comments
Jerry Mouse

@iampytest1@infosec.exchange @SpaceLifeForm@infosec.exchange I go with iampytest1 here, as the two of them do tent to generate conflict, and beside of that, they are using the same rule base, so you are only burning your money in Power bills by using more and other than gorhills ublock origin

19 August at 21:56 | Open on matrix.rocks
Alexei
iam-py-test :unverified:
iam-py-test :unverified:
SpaceLifeForm

@iampytest1 @ghostwords

The screenshot is exactly what I would I would expect to see from PrivacyBadger.

That is when I close the tab.

You want to use uBlockOrigin to prevent JavaScript injection as much as possible.

And use PrivacyBadger to block cookie tracking as much as possible.

If you do not use the combo, then malicious JavaScript will leak your tracking cookies.

I may be incorrect on my conclusion here, but I have been doing this combo for many years. Defense in depth. No reason to make it easy for attackers.

#uBlockOrigin #PrivacyBadger #Infosec

@iampytest1 @ghostwords

The screenshot is exactly what I would I would expect to see from PrivacyBadger.

That is when I close the tab.

You want to use uBlockOrigin to prevent JavaScript injection as much as possible.

And use PrivacyBadger to block cookie tracking as much as possible.

If you do not use the combo, then malicious JavaScript will leak your tracking cookies.

20 August at 0:19 | Open on infosec.exchange
Go Up